Top Hyperliquid RPC providers for 2025

Hyperliquid has become a popular choice for builders and traders thanks to its high throughput, EVM compatibility, and order book design. This guide compares the top RPC providers in 2025 and shows how to pick and set up the right one for trading bots, staking, and smart contracts.

Hyperliquid is fast becoming the chain of choice for builders seeking speed. This is no surprise, as the architecture is designed for it: a native order book is tied directly to HyperEVM, so your Solidity contracts run against the same state as live trades. Add sub-second finality through HyperBFT, negligible fees, and immense throughput, and you get an environment built for high-speed trading bots, on-chain funds, and real-time apps.

Naturally, the free public Hyperliquid RPC is your first stop for testing, though limits vary by method, and some public endpoints are capped near ~100 requests/min. So, if you’re moving into production, you’d look for a private RPC provider. Yet performance across these providers is anything but consistent (and some proprietary HyperCore trading methods remain public-RPC-only, regardless of provider).

That’s why we lined up the main Hyperliquid RPC providers and put them side by side on speed, scale, and reliability so you can see which one matches your build.

Comparison of the best Hyperliquid RPC providers

Here’s a quick look at how the top Hyperliquid RPC providers stack up on rate limits, latency, pricing, and network coverage.

(Note: some HyperCore endpoints, such as trading methods, are still only available through the public Hyperliquid RPC)

Chainstack

Chainstack is a multi-chain infrastructure platform and one of the first providers to bring full Hyperliquid RPC support to production. By choosing Chainstack Hyperliquid RPC endpoints, you get private access to both HyperEVM (smart contracts) and HyperCore (the native order book) over HTTP and WebSocket, all backed by a guaranteed 99.9% uptime, with most HyperCore methods available privately and a few remaining public-only per Hyperliquid’s own setup.

What’s more, with Chainstack, you get a full set of tools that make building on Hyperliquid easier, all from the same platform, including:

• One of the first built-in Hyperliquid faucet to grab testnet HYPE.
• HyperEVM archive for historical reads, plus HyperEVM WebSockets for live contract events.
• A method table showing 100+ HyperEVM calls (with notes on which HyperCore methods are public-RPC-only), an API reference, MCP Server, and even a ready-to-clone trading bot repo.
• Access rules to set limits on keys, requests, and IPs directly from the dashboard.

Backed by a globally distributed, multi-cloud network, Chainstack delivers predictable performance for builders moving from test to production. And the setup takes just a few minutes in the console.

How much does Chainstack cost?

Chainstack has cost-effective plans, so infra costs are easy to track and estimate:

• Developer — free, 3M requests/month (~25 RPS), $20 per extra million.
• Growth — $49/month, 20M requests (~250 RPS), $15 per extra million.
• Pro — $199/month, 80M requests (~400 RPS), $12.5 per extra million.
• Business — $349/month, 140M requests (~600 RPS), $10 per extra million.
• Enterprise — from $990/month, 400M requests (custom RPS), extra from $5 per million.
• Unlimited Node Add-on — flat monthly fee for unmetered requests starting from $149.
• Dedicated — $0.50/hour + storage for exclusive ultra-high performance Hyperliquid nodes.

This setup offers one of the few providers that allow you to start for free and scale into predictable tiers as traffic grows.

Performance on Hyperliquid with Chainstack

Chainstack’s entire stack is engineered to give you the competitive edge on Hyperliquid with:

• Global routing: Deploy nodes in the US, EU, or Asia regions to minimize latency.
• Uptime guarantee: 99.9%+ uptime on Hyperliquid nodes, with self-healing infra behind it.
• Performance: Low on EVM calls, upper tiers support ~400–600 RPS for heavy use.
• Monitoring: Built-in tools and compare benchmarks to validate endpoint performance against competitors.

Pros & cons of Chainstack

You get everything you need for Hyperliquid on Chainstack: private HyperEVM and HyperCore endpoints, a faucet for testnet HYPE, HyperEVM archive + HyperEVM WebSockets, and monitoring in the same console. The pricing model is clear, nodes are distributed globally, and there’s a free tier to try it out, making it the strongest choice for anyone building on Hyperliquid.

Quicknode

QuickNode has recently added Hyperliquid to its lineup of supported chains. The provider runs on a globally distributed, auto-scaling network of RPC nodes, routing traffic to the closest region to keep latency low. Hyperliquid support covers the standard JSON-RPC methods for HyperEVM, with private endpoints over HTTP and WebSocket.

Unlike platforms that bundle in extras like a faucet or Hyperliquid-specific monitoring, QuickNode keeps its offer focused on RPC delivery. The additional tooling available — Streams, Webhooks, and analytics APIs — is broader but geared more toward other networks in its stack rather than Hyperliquid itself. WebSockets and archive refer to HyperEVM by default. Check QuickNode docs for any HyperCore stream coverage.

How much does Quicknode cost?

QuickNode runs on a credit system across its monthly plans. It gives flexibility, but once your quota burns through, you’ll need to watch usage to avoid extra costs.

With Quicknode, you get a free trial for one month, which includes 10 million credits at 15 RPS, but there’s no permanent free tier for Hyperliquid. Other paid plans available on the platform are:

• Build — $49/month, 80M credits, ~50 RPS
• Accelerate — $249/month, 450M credits, ~125 RPS
• Scale — $499/month, 950M credits, ~250 RPS
• Business — $999/month, 2B credits, ~500 RPS

Overage runs around $0.50–$0.62 per million requests, depending on plan. Every plan includes access to QuickNode’s wider multi-chain stack, Streams for WebSocket feeds, archived data, and the developer dashboard.

Performance on Hyperliquid with Quicknode

QuickNode focuses on speed and uptime for Hyperliquid. That said, request-per-second limits are enforced per plan, so scaling heavy workloads may mean upgrading or spreading the load across endpoints.

• Uptime: 99.99% uptime on paid plans, with billing tied to availability.
• Latency: Low response times because of global routing and caching.
• Throughput: Capped by plan (50–500 RPS), so higher loads need larger tiers or multiple endpoints.
• Scale: Network handles 400B+ requests monthly across all supported chains.
• Hyperliquid tooling: unlike some providers, QuickNode does not offer Hyperliquid-specific extras such as a faucet or dedicated monitoring tools.

Pros & cons of Quicknode

QuickNode delivers fast, globally routed Hyperliquid RPC with an SLA suited for production use, though its credit-based pricing can add complexity. A solid choice if you need scale and multi-chain tooling, but for Hyperliquid-specific features like faucets or dedicated monitoring, other providers fit better.

Alchemy

Alchemy recently rolled out Hyperliquid support through HyperEVM endpoints, making it easy for developers already familiar with Ethereum tools to plug in. You can still use the same libraries, like ethers.js, web3.py, and the workflow feels the same.

The platform carries over much of what it’s known for on Ethereum and Polygon: APIs like Transact and Notify, detailed analytics dashboards, and debugging utilities such as transaction simulation. On Hyperliquid, this translates to full RPC access to chain data, along with the ability to trigger trading functions through HyperEVM. WebSockets and archive are for HyperEVM. Review Alchemy docs for any HyperCore stream support.

How much does Alchemy cost?

One thing to note is that Alchemy measures usage in Compute Units (CUs) rather than raw requests. For Hyperliquid teams making lots of lightweight, latency-sensitive calls, this can make costs less predictable than flat request-based models.

That said, Alchemy does offer a free tier: up to 300 million CUs per month with ~300 RPS throughput, enough for many small to mid-sized projects. Beyond that, the pricing options are:

• Pay-as-you-go — $5 per 11M CUs (~$0.45/M)
• Growth — $49/month for ~400M CUs
• Scale — $289/month for 1.5B CUs (~$0.19/M)
• Enterprise — custom pricing, with lower per-unit costs at very high volumes

Performance on Hyperliquid with Alchemy

Alchemy runs a solid global setup for performance and uptime, which you can see reflected across its platform. One thing to note, though: they don’t publish Hyperliquid-specific performance data, so it’s hard to judge how it stacks up in practice.

• Uptime: ~99.9% historical uptime.
• Latency: global routing for consistent response times.
• Throughput: up to 300 RPS on free, scales higher with paid plans.
• Architecture: “Supernode” tech handles parallel requests through caching and load balancing.

Pros & cons of Alchemy

While Alchemy doesn’t include Hyperliquid-specific tools, it’s still an easy way to get started and connect through a familiar setup. Pricing runs on compute units instead of raw requests, so costs can fluctuate if you’re sending a high number of simple calls.

dRPC

dRPC is one of the newer names in the industry, built around a decentralized model and supporting Hyperliquid from day one. Here, instead of a single backend, traffic is routed through a network of independent node operators, with an AI balancer deciding where each request goes.

With this setup, DRPC aims to combine redundancy with ease of use. That said, since the platform is still fairly new, there’s not a ton of long-term data yet on how it performs under constant production load. dRPC exposes HyperEVM archive and HyperEVM WebSockets; consult docs for any HyperCore streaming options.

How much does dRPC cost?

dRPC pricing is pretty simple, as you just pay for what you use.

• Free plan — $0/month, and runs between roughly 40 and 250 RPS, depending on network load.
• Premium plan — $6 per 1M requests, flat rate across all chains and methods.
• Volume discounts — Available for high-traffic users.

It’s a good setup if you’re testing or ramping up a smaller Hyperliquid project. However, teams already in production may prefer something with defined quotas and guaranteed support.

Performance on Hyperliquid with dRPC

dRPC’s setup moves traffic across seven regional clusters, sending each call to whichever node is both close and under-loaded. That system helps balance speed and consistency across a decentralized network. So you can generally expect:

• Throughput: Up to 5,000 RPS per endpoint on premium plan.
• Latency: Routing that automatically favors the fastest available node.
• Uptime: Uptime that’s strong in practice, though detailed SLAs aren’t public yet.
• Scalability: No fixed rate limits on premium, with unlimited API keys.
• Infrastructure: Built-in redundancy, so if one node stalls, another picks up the load.

Pros & cons of dRPC

In short, dRPC is a flexible choice for builders who want raw RPC access and are open to using a newer service that’s still proving itself.

HypeRPC

HypeRPC is a bit different from most RPC providers, as it’s built solely for Hyperliquid. Everything in its setup, from caching layers to where servers sit, is tuned around this one network. The team works closely with Hyperliquid’s core devs, which likely helps them stay ahead on updates and performance tweaks.

You can pick between shared global endpoints or a dedicated setup that’s fully isolated. That focus pays off in raw speed, though it ties you to a single ecosystem. Therefore, it’s a great fit if you are all-in on Hyperliquid, but less ideal if you’re managing a stack that spans multiple chains. By default, HypeRPC covers HyperEVM archive and HyperEVM WebSockets; review HypeRPC docs for current HyperCore stream availability.

How much does HypeRPC cost?

With HypeRPC you get plans that are focused on performance over high quotas and sit at the premium end of the market:

• Starter — Free, 10K requests/month, 5 RPS.
• Professional — $99/month, 1M requests, 50 RPS.
• Enterprise — $299/month, 3M requests, 150 RPS.
• Unlimited — $499/month, 5M requests, 300 RPS.
• Dedicated nodes — Custom pricing with no hard caps.

There are no public overage fees; once you reach your plan’s limit, you’ll likely need to upgrade. The cost is higher compared to general RPC providers, but it reflects HypeRPC’s focus on one network and its optimized setup for Hyperliquid.

Performance on Hyperliquid with HypeRPC

Since HypeRPC is built only for Hyperliquid, its servers sit close to the chain’s validators, trimming latency to almost nothing. It’s designed for fast, continuous trading workloads rather than casual testing so you’ll notice:

• Uptime: 99.99% uptime.
• Latency: Very low latency from regional nodes in Europe and Japan.
• Scalability: Enough headroom to handle short market spikes or steady high-frequency traffic.
• Visibility: A live dashboard that lets you watch latency and request counts in real time.
• Security: Enterprise-grade DDoS protection and routing safeguards for live trading environments.

Pros & cons of HypeRPC

HypeRPC gives you exactly what you’d expect from a Hyperliquid-only provider:  speed, uptime, and a setup tuned for trading workloads. It’s a strong pick if your whole stack runs on Hyperliquid and you care about every millisecond. But if you’re running multi-chain systems or want broader flexibility, pairing it with another provider might make more sense.

Dwellir

Dwellir, known for its work in the Polkadot ecosystem, now offers dedicated Hyperliquid RPC nodes. Unlike most providers, Dwellir doesn’t run shared endpoints. Each user gets their own managed node by Dwellir’s team.

That setup means you’re not competing for bandwidth with anyone else, which helps keep performance the same. While there’s no free tier or pooled capacity, the trade-off is full control, consistency, HyperEVM archive + HyperEVM WebSockets, and the ability to integrate directly with HyperCore gRPC streams.

How much does Dwellir cost?

With Dwellir, there’s no free tier for Hyperliquid since every setup is private, but you’re getting a dedicated environment from day one. It’s a good pick if you need stable performance, predictable behavior, and higher throughput than what shared plans can usually handle. Their growth plan starts at $299/month and includes:

• One fully managed Hyperliquid node (no shared capacity)
• Up to 150 million responses per month
• Around 500 RPS throughput
• No overage fees, as usage is naturally limited by the RPS cap

Performance on Hyperliquid with Dwellir

Because every Dwellir project runs on its own node, traffic from other users never touches your infrastructure. That isolation gives you stable behavior even when the chain gets busy, meaning:

• Throughput: Up to 500 RPS by default, with higher limits available on request.
• Latency: Solid because of dedicated resources, though real-world response times may vary depending on your region.
• Real-time data: HyperCore gRPC streaming for order-book and trade events, plus HyperEVM WebSockets for contract events.
• Monitoring: A dashboard where you can check metrics and stats.

Pros & cons of Dwellir

If you need a stable, fully managed Hyperliquid node and don’t mind paying for reliability, Dwellir is a good pick, but not for those who want to test.

How to get a Hyperliquid RPC

There are plenty of ways to connect to Hyperliquid, and the right provider for you will depend on what you want to build. If you want something reliable, quick to set up, and with extras like a faucet and archive data, Chainstack is a good place to start. You can spin up a private Hyperliquid RPC in minutes and start building right away in a few clicks:

1. Log in to your Chainstack account (or create one if you don’t have it yet).
2. Create a new project or select an existing one.
3. Pick Hyperliquid as the network and choose mainnet or testnet.
4. Deploy a node configured for RPC access.
5. Once deployed, you’ll find your private RPC URLs, including /evm and /info, in the dashboard.

Wrapping up

Hyperliquid is a high-performance network, and its rise has pulled more builders and infra teams into its ecosystem. As that happens, infrastructure becomes the differentiator. The teams that stay reliable under load aren’t always the biggest; they’re the ones that choose a stable foundation early on.

Whether you’re testing or already running production bots, starting with something solid like Chainstack lets you focus on building while the network keeps growing underneath you.

Power-boost your project on Chainstack

• Discover how you can save thousands in infra costs every month with our unbeatable pricing on the most complete Web3 development platform.
• Input your workload and see how affordable Chainstack is compared to other RPC providers.
• Connect to Ethereum, Solana, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Avalanche, TON, Ronin, zkSync Era, Starknet, Scroll, Aptos, Fantom, Cronos, Gnosis Chain, Klaytn, Moonbeam, Celo, Aurora, Oasis Sapphire, Polygon zkEVM, Bitcoin and Harmony mainnet or testnets through an interface designed to help you get the job done.
• To learn more about Chainstack, visit our Developer Portal or join our Discord server and Telegram group. 
• Are you in need of testnet tokens? Request some from our faucets. Multi-chain faucet, Sepolia faucet, Holesky faucet, BNB faucet, zkSync faucet, Scroll faucet.

Have you already explored what you can achieve with Chainstack? Get started for free today.

FAQ