I was already using Alchemy's API, but their pay-as-you-go pricing is too high for me. I decided to try Chainstack's monthly subscription, and so far, so good.
Infura offers managed blockchain APIs within the MetaMask ecosystem, while Alchemy combines RPC access with developer tools. Compare both with Chainstack for performance, reliability, and predictable RPC costs.
Compare Infura and Alchemy on billing, performance, security, reliability, and chain coverage. See where Chainstack fits your workload.
Infura assigns credit costs to RPC methods and applies daily quotas and throughput limits. Alchemy meters usage in compute units and offers pay-as-you-go billing. Your method mix affects how far each allowance goes.
Chainstack bills standard full-node RPC calls at 1 request unit and archive calls at 2 request units. For sustained traffic, the Unlimited Node add-on offers unlimited requests within your selected RPS tier for a fixed monthly fee.
Explore pricingInfura and Alchemy provide managed RPC APIs for production applications. Latency depends on the chain, method, deployment region, and load, so test each provider against your actual workload.
Chainstack Global Nodes route requests across regions. For Solana transaction submission, Trader Nodes and Warp transactions provide specialized options for latency-sensitive workloads.
Learn moreAlchemy publishes SOC 2 Type II certification and a Trust Center. For Infura, confirm the applicable audit reports and security controls with its team when evaluating enterprise requirements.
Chainstack holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001 certifications, with security reports available for review.
Learn moreInfura lists committed SLAs on its Enterprise plan. Alchemy also offers signed SLAs on Enterprise. Check coverage, exclusions, and support response times before choosing a plan.
Chainstack publishes 99.99%+ uptime and offers uptime SLAs on Enterprise. Use the status page and performance dashboard to review service availability and RPC performance.
Check Chainstack statusInfura advertises access to 40+ supported networks, while Alchemy advertises 100+ chains. Check the specific mainnets, testnets, and API methods your application needs; provider coverage counts use different definitions.
Chainstack supports 70+ blockchain protocols through one platform, with Global Nodes, Dedicated Nodes, and archive access available across supported networks.
Explore all protocolsCompare Infura, Alchemy, and Chainstack on billing, infrastructure, and enterprise features.
Swipe sideways to compare providers.
| Feature | Infura | Alchemy | ![]() |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supported coverage | 40+ networks | 100+ chains | 70+ protocols |
| Unlimited requests for a flat fee | Credit quotas | Usage-based billing | Unlimited Node add-on |
| Billing units | Method-weighted credits | Method-weighted compute units | 1 RU full / 2 RU archive |
| Contractual SLA | Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| SOC 2 Type II | Confirm with Infura | Yes | Yes |
| Pay-as-you-go | Subscriptions and add-ons | Yes | Available for qualified teams |
| Pay with crypto | Confirm with Infura | Confirm enterprise terms | Yes |
| Low-latency RPC APIs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Custom chain infrastructure | Not publicly listed | Rollups | Appchain infrastructure |
| SSO login | Confirm with Infura | Enterprise offering | Yes |
| Dedicated node infrastructure | Not publicly listed | Dedicated Clusters | Dedicated Nodes |
Feedback from teams evaluating Chainstack alongside Alchemy for pricing, performance, and production RPC workloads.
I was already using Alchemy's API, but their pay-as-you-go pricing is too high for me. I decided to try Chainstack's monthly subscription, and so far, so good.
I am pretty happy with the Chainstack experience so far and will definitely think of keeping using it over Alchemy!
Both are definitely better than Alchemy nodes that I also tested
So far your service is showing transactions considerably faster than other options I've tried (publicnode, drpc, alchemy). You are beating the next best option by a median of 500ms. You also forward a higher percentage of landed transactions.
The Growth plan delivered exactly that. Fast, no gaps, no silent empty responses. The backfill completed cleanly.
More practical guides and comparisons for choosing, pricing, and migrating RPC infrastructure.
Compare Ethereum RPC providers, including Infura, Alchemy, and Chainstack, for production workloads.
Read more
Move endpoints, update apps, and validate production traffic with less switching risk.
Read more
Review Alchemy's RPC offering, strengths, tradeoffs, and where teams compare alternatives.
Read more
Compare free RPC plans, usage limits, and developer features across major providers.
Read moreExplore the platform and see how Chainstack can power your build.